Episode 189: Memento Mori, Motherfacer

December 15, 2021

Attention EconomyData Mining

Central Thesis

Ad-supported social media, specifically Fuckbook (Facebook), profits by disrespecting users' memories, exploiting grief for engagement, and automating indifference to death in the pursuit of attention, proving the corruption inherent in its business model.

Key Arguments

Fuckbook's primary goal is maximizing user engagement to sell advertising. This overrides any concern for the user's well-being or dignity. The constant bombardment of emails and the manipulation of content feeds serve only to keep users glued to the platform.

The platform’s algorithm fails to properly handle the profiles and memories of deceased users, often suggesting deceased individuals as contacts or even tagging them in posts, causing pain and distress to their loved ones. This exposes a lack of human consideration in the platform’s design.

Fuckbook creates "ghost profiles" for individuals who are not users themselves but are mentioned by users, effectively including them in the data mining process without their consent. This demonstrates an invasive approach to gathering user data.

The algorithmic nature of Fuckbook's operations means that it lacks the sensitivity and nuance necessary to deal with life events, particularly death. The automated messages and friend suggestions reveal a cold, uncaring system driven solely by profit.

Notable Passages

Rhetorical Approach

Jim employs a blend of personal anecdote, sardonic humor, and direct address to make his argument. He uses the stories of Vern's funeral, Nellis's death, his brothers' losses, and Jonathan's passing to illustrate Fuckbook's failings. The use of "Fuckbook" instead of Facebook, and "Zuckerfuck" instead of Zuckerberg, along with frequent sarcastic asides, emphasizes his contempt for the platform and its creator. He also uses the historical example of the memento mori to underscore the importance of acknowledging death with respect and intentionality.

Connections